Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


New Judge Takes Over Shi’ites Proscription Case

The case filed by the Islamic Movement in Nigeria, a body of Shi’ite Muslims, to challenge their proscription and designation as a terrorist group has been re-assigned to another judge of the court.

It was gathered on Friday that the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice John Tsoho, re-assigned the case from Justice Nkeonye Maha, who issued the proscription order ex parte on July 26, 2019, to Justice Inyang Ekwo, who also sits in the Abuja division of the court.

This was confirmed by a copy of the hearing notice issued by the registry of Justice Ekwo’s court on October 16, 2019, indicating that the new judge had taken over the case.

A copy of the hearing notice seen by our correspondent on Friday slated the hearing of the IMN case before the new judge for November 25.

Recall that Justice Maha issued the proscription order while she was sitting as a vacation judge, but all the efforts by the IMN’s legal team to have the judge hear the application challenging the order during the vacation period proved abortive.

On the resumption of the court’s judges for the new 2019/2020 legal year in September, the chief judge decided not to return the IMN case to Justice Maha but to re-assign it to Justice Ekwo.

Justice Maha had, following the Federal Government’s ex parte application, issued the order of proscription of the Shiite organisation and designated the group’s activities in any part of Nigeria “as acts of terrorism and illegality”.

The court in the ruling delivered on July 26, 2019, restrained “any person or group of persons” from participating in any form of activities involving or concerning the IMN “under any name or platform” in Nigeria.

Following the issuance of the proscription order on July 26, the Federal Government, on July 29, published the proscription order; but the IMN, on August 2, 2019, filed its application to challenge the proscription order.

The group, in the application filed on behalf of the group by Mr Femi Falana (SAN), alleged as part of the grounds for seeking the reversal of the proscription order that the order was made without jurisdiction.

The Federal Government has, however, opposed the application urging the court to affirm the proscription order.

In its counter-affidavit filed against the IMN’s motion, the Federal Government alleged that the leader of the IMN, Sheik Ibrahim El-Zakzaky, had the sole aim of turning Nigerian into an Islamic state.


Follow us on Twitter at @thesignalng

Copyright 2019 SIGNAL. Permission to use portions of this article is granted provided appropriate credits are given to and other relevant source.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, says Nigeria has been recording over-bloated figures of votes since the 1999 general elections when the country returned to...


A Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Femi Falana, has accused the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) of flouting the interim injunction of the Supreme Court...


Point of Sale terminal operators and Lagos-based human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, have said they will sue the Central Bank of Nigeria if it...


Human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, on Sunday faulted the recent endorsement of the naira redesign by President Muhammadu Buhari, saying the policy may be...

Copyright ©