Tanko Muhammad, acting chief justice of Nigeria (CJN), says President Muhammadu Buhari did not need the permission of the National Judicial Council to appoint him.
According to PUNCH, Muhammad made the claim in response to a query given to him by the NJC, the body constitutionally empowered to recommend the appointment of chief justices and heads of courts.
The NJC had issued queries to him and Walter Onnoghen, suspended CJN, in January.
While Onnoghen was asked to react to the allegations of corruption levelled against him, Muhammad was asked to clarify the reason he allowed himself to be sworn in by the president without recourse to the NJC.
In his response, Muhammad said the NJC ought to be consulted only when a substantive CJN is being appointed or re-appointed.
“In my respectful view, the National Judicial Council has no role to play in the appointment of an acting Chief Justice of Nigeria in the first instance, that is to say on first appointment. The council comes in where the appointment as the acting CJN is to be renewed or extended. I humbly refer to Section 231(4) of the 1999 Constitution.”
Muhammad added that Onnoghen remained the substantive CJN, saying he was only suspended.
The acting CJN said if the appeal court or the Code of Conduct Tribunal reversed Onnoghen’s suspension, he would immediately step aside and return to his former position as a justice of the Supreme Court.
“It was for the larger interest of the judiciary and the constitutionality that I accepted to be sworn in as acting CJN with the conviction that if the order of January 23, 2019 is eventually set aside, the status quo would be restored,” he reportedly said.
“But before it is set aside, there should be no vacuum in the office of the CJN and the chairman of the NJC.”
Recalling how he was sworn in by the president, Muhammad said he was summoned to the presidential villa by Buhari and shown the certified true copy of a motion ex parte granted by the CCT and signed by Danladi Umar, its chairman.
“On January 25, 2019, I was summoned to the Aso Villa at the instance of the President. Prior to the summons, I was not aware of the fact that the Code of Conduct Tribunal made any order on January 23, 2019,” he said.
“Furthermore, beyond what I read in the newspapers and watched on the television just like any other Nigerian, I was not privileged to see any of the processes filed by the parties before the tribunal. Hence, I could not really appreciate the merit or demerit of divergent positions.
“On the 25th day of January, the President swore me in as the acing CJN and not as the substantive CJN. Justice Walter Onnoghen remains the CJN until he is removed from office in accordance with the provision of the constitution. He is only suspended.”
He, however, said he had nothing to do with the speech delivered by the president wherein the suspended CJN was accused Onnoghen of frustrating his anti-corruption war.
Muhammad admitted that he was a member of the NJC panel that removed Obisike Orji of the Abia state high court for accepting to be sworn in as chief judge by the state government without a recommendation of the NJC.
He, however, said his own case was different because he was only appointed as an acting CJN.
Muhammad said the substantive head of the judiciary had been suspended by a valid court order which made it right for him to take over in acting capacity.
The acting CJN therefore appealed to the NJC to dismiss the petition written against him.
________
Follow us on Twitter at @thesignalng
Copyright 2019 SIGNAL. Permission to use portions of this article is granted provided appropriate credits are given to www.signalng.com and other relevant source.
